ULUSLARARASI İLİŞKİLER TEORİLERİ I

Keohane and Nye argue that regimes are regulations comprising of the rules, norms and procedures
influencing behaviors and results. Hedley Bull, defines the regimes as rules and institutions that regulate behaviors of individuals and states. Krasner noted that regimes should not be seen as provisional regulations changing according to the change of power and interest in international relations. Keohane also pointed out that regimes should be differentiated from treaties in a certain subject. A treaty can be ad hoc in character but also would be narrow in terms of subject matter and parties. However, regimes are not always limited to a certain subject and not interim provision.

The view that regimes generate differential benefits for states belongs to realists.

Numbered views as I, III, and V belong to Liberal institutionalists.

The expression that regimes flourish best when promoted and maintained by a benign hegemon belongs to Liberal institutionalists.

Keohane also pointed out that regimes should be differentiated from treaties in a certain subject. A treaty can be ad hoc in character but also would be narrow in terms of subject matter and parties. However, regimes are not always limited to a certain subject and not interim provision.

All international institutions cannot be assumed as international regimes. International regimes are sub section of international institutions.

Numbered views as I, III, and V belong to realists.

That regimes flourish best when promoted and maintained by a benign hegemon is the one of the assumptions of liberal institutionalists.

Regimes enable states to coordinate. This assumption is one of the assumptions of realists.

Krasner noted that regimes should not be seen as provisional regulations changing according to the change of power and interest in international relations.