Aof Panel

Soru 1

What does mean of "reasoning that moves from general premises, which are known or presumed to be known, to certain conclusions"?

Soru 2

Which type of interpretation does look at the context of a norm; hence, it involves an investigation into the relations between the norm to be applied and other relevant norms and codes of the same legal system?

Soru 3

Which of the following statements about legal reasoning is true?

Soru 4

I. Even the meaning of a statute or concept is plain and clear, the other types of interpretation must be used.

II. According to the systematic interpretation, judges have the duty to search for what the legislature meant when enacting the text, which raises the question of how the intention of the legislator is to be ascertained in such a case.

III."Cessante ratione legis cessat ipsa lex" is a teleological method which takes into account the so-called ‘nature of the thing’.

Which of the statement(s) is/are true?

Soru 5

Which type of interpretation does require an investigation into the semantic content and the syntactic structure of a provision.?

Soru 6

The ... is an inquiry into the actual intention of the legislator, which is, therefore, a variation of historical interpretation.

Which of the below sentence can fill the blanks?

Soru 7

Which of the following statements about the interpretation of contracts is false?

Soru 8

Which of the following statements about the gaps in law is false?

Soru 9

What does the mean of "interpretatio cessat in claris"?

Soru 10

Men are mortal (major premise)
Socrates is a man (minor premise)
Therefore, Socrates is mortal. (conclusion)

According to this example, which legal reasoning can it be?

Soru 11

For the resolution of further cases- the syllogism provides a working guide for the judges, the litigants and their legal advisers.

According to this sentence, which function of legal syllogism can be expressed?

Soru 12

Analogy is an extension of the scope of a norm to be applied. Yet the purpose of a statute may sometimes prohibit analogical reasoning. In such cases, the argument of reduction may come into play.

Which of the following can it be called?

Soru 13

Which statement below about interpretation of statues is false?

Soru 14

Which of the following argument-types is related to analogy?

Soru 15

I. Semiotic interpretation requires an investigation into the semantic content and the syntactic structure of a provision. II. Genetic interpretation is an inquiry into the meaning of legal terms as intended by the historical legislator.III. Objective-teleological interpretation is an inquiry into the actual intention of the legislator, which is, therefore, a variation of historical interpretation. Which statement(s) is/are true?

Soru 16

Which statement about interpretation is false?

Soru 17

In France, what is historical interpretation called?

Soru 18

I. The principle of superiority: "lex posterior derogat legi priori".

II. The principle of posteriority: “lex specialis derogat legi generali”.

III. The principle of speciality: “lex superior derogat legi inferiori”.

Which statement(s) is/are false?

Soru 19

What is dissenting opinion or dissent?

Soru 20

What are secondary sources of law?

HUKUKA GİRİŞ